THE WINDUP:
I went to an armory sale yesterday. Not to buy, as I was quite clear to the staff at the entry, who dutifully asked me to sign up for a 'drawing' (for what, I have no idea), while they figured out which salesman was up in the rotation to 'assign' me to.
I really just wanted to go in and see the various pianos, and maybe try a few of them, *then* ask any questions of a salesman not busy with a serious buyer. But of course the sale wasn't structured to permit that. As soon as I found that out, I took a different tack. First, after meeting the salesman, I told him that a.) I AM NOT buying a piano today, I was only trying to gain information and education for a future purchase (truth); b.) I know absolutely NOTHING about pianos and piano construction (partial truth); c.) I myself do not play (many would claim this is absolute truth); and d.) I would ultimately be buying a piano for my daughters to learn on (hopefully truth).
I realized that this sale was the salesguys' bread and butter, and I truly did not go in there wanting to waste anyone's time that would otherwise be pursuing a serious sale. But I guess I didn't feel too guilty with the partial truths told because, frankly, I resented not being able to browse without a full-time 'escort.'
The reason I said that I didn't play, and that I didn't know anything about pianos was that I decided that if I were going to be led around virtually on a leash, I wanted to hear the 'pure pitch.' IOW, what is this guy telling the average, uninformed person walking in the door.
I will say that, by and large, what he said generally held true to what I've read and seen discussed in the newsgroup. One thing that he showed me raised a question in my mind.
THE PITCH
The sales guy pointed out on an upright (manufactured by a competing brand, of course) utilized an aluminum main action rail, whereas on their brand only used wood, which he said was preferable, although more expensive. I asked him why it was preferable, and his response was that the aluminum rail would strip out easier, causing problems in regulating, and that the techs preferred the wood.
MY ACTUAL QUESTION:
Now, the question: if you are a tech, what is your opinion and experience with an aluminum main action rail versus wood? And if you happen to be a manufacturer reading this, what are the various 'positions' regarding the acceptability, or preferability, of either? I'm not looking for reams of documentation and counter documentation, I'm just curious as to the basic positions.
To my mind, an answer like 'After testing, we felt that while aluminum had a shorter lifespan than wood, it had an acceptable lifespan under normal home use and expected maintenance schedules, so we were able to reduce the cost of the piano $5.00' is, believe it or not, an acceptable and even logical answer. Likewise, an answer of 'We've always used wood, and it works great. Wood has worked for years, and our retooling costs to switch to aluminum would offset any cost savings to us' is equally acceptable. I don't want to hear that one, or the other, is absolutely stupid and unacceptable (obviously untrue, or they wouldn't be used). I can appreciate that there are different levels of performance required for home versus professional use, and that either is appropriate in its intended venue. AND I DON'T WANT TO START A BIG ARGUMENT!!!! In the end, it just doesn't matter, at the moment, I'm not buying either one. Just curious, not argumentative.
Dwain Lee my 'serious' website:
http://www.dlarch.com my 'only-for-fun' piano-related website: